I contributed to AEC Bytes, a leading source for AEC technology trends, and edited by Lachmi Khemlani. This article follows up on past articles and blog posts I have written on the transformation of the buildings industry and influence of key market drivers such as BIM and virtual modeling. I incorporate new insights I have gained to provide additional market strategies for both AEC tech firms as well as 'cleantech' firms in the energy efficiency, energy modeling, CSR reporting, health & safety, and lifecycle assessment segments.
Link: http://www.aecbytes.com/viewpoint/2008/issue_39.html
Read more!
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Article on 'AEC Bytes' for Green Technology Trends in Buldings / Facilities
Posted by
Scott Boutwell
at
10:34 AM
0
comments
Labels: AEC Bytes, article on AEC Bytes, BIM, cleantech, CSR, energy modeling, lifecycle assessment, market strategy, virtual modeling
Saturday, May 10, 2008
Use of Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) in Sustainability Programs
Recently read a blog post on TriplePundit by ClimateCheck, regarding the development of ISO 14064, which covers the measurement and reduction of GHG emissions.
A comment in the article (link is here) caught my eye:
"One of the challenges is the use of an “approved or standardized” approach to quantifying the carbon credits created by new technologies. There are many approaches being used, ranging from in-house engineering calculations to full life cycle analyses (LCA) and computer models"
It made me think about the 'state of the art' of LCAs...(yes, I know: I may lead a very lonely life)......anyway, I do think that LCAs can be a very powerful tool to identify, measure, and manage GHG emissions, as well as do the same for other important 'sustainability' metrics such as: resource consumption (i.e. water); toxics use and emissions, and of course carbon footprinting.
LCAs have been around for quite a while; I developed (rudimentary) tools for environmental management problems in the 80s and 90s; focusing on chemical disposal / recycling challenges. Product Stewardship and 'Responsible Care' were the primary drivers of this market at this time; both programs were developed by the chemical industry in response to potential strict regulations in the aftermath of catastrophic environmental incidents (Bhopal, West Virginia chemical releases). But these programs did not really look at impacts in production; they focused more on the impacts after the sale.
Currently, qualitative LCAs are in use ("LCA Lite" is a term a peer of mine in the manufacturing consulting industry has used). These are quite useful for strategic planning, prioritization and ranking of initiatives and programs, and communications / marketing purposes, but may not add value for decision making on supply chain optimization and 'greening', or similar decisions in green product development in PLM efforts.
I think the standards organizations such as ISO and the Voluntary Carbon Standard are taking a lead in the development of rigorous methodologies, as well as definition of metrics that may be accepted by industries.
This is a market sector that I think both technology companies and service providers may have significant success in the next few years; tech companies in the CSR and supply chain mgt sectors are well positioned to incorporate LCA functionality (and data sets); and 'white space' development and industry - specific customization will be required to get LCAs to the point of being widely accepted tools for sustainability decision making.
Read more!
Posted by
Scott Boutwell
at
1:12 PM
0
comments
Labels: CSR consulting, environmental management, ISO 14064, LCA, lifecycle assessment, PLM, supply chain, sustainability, Voluntary Carbon Standard
Saturday, April 05, 2008
Sustainability in the Water Sector
I read an interesting article about water sustainability; link is here. Terminology is also interesting: “Water Footprinting” and “Embedded Water” are phrases that are used; perhaps there is opportunity to brand this issue and break it out from other sustainability topics….
The author talks about impacts on water resources which are not adequately reflected in consumer products. Some examples:
- It takes 8000 liters of water to make pair of leather shoes,
- 2400 liters to make a hamburger, and
- 170 liters to make a pint of beer (Ok, so that one is not as compelling to some of you…)
In particular, the construction industry is identified as a market where there is a need for more enlightenment. This industry already incorporates the use of water saving products & devices; utilizes design & construction methodology to promote and achieve sustainability accreditation (i.e. LEED and BREAM); but is not on the vanguard of understanding the demands of water resources to manufacture supplies, equipment, and fixtures.
As ‘sustainability’ continue to develops in awareness, it would seem that specific areas (water, GHG, health & safety, toxics mgt, etc) will evolve and become well defined areas; thus driving more awareness, research, and development of tools that are specific to those problem sets. Again, lifecycle assessment may serve an important role in identifying and quantifying water resource impacts, so that decision makers and consumers have complete information upon which to make design and construction decisions.
Posted by
Scott Boutwell
at
1:16 PM
0
comments
Labels: embedding water, footprinting, lifecycle assessment, sustainability, water